Transit Management Center --> Parking Management Center:
transit schedule adherence information
Definitions
transit schedule adherence information (Information Flow): Dynamic transit schedule adherence and transit vehicle location information.
Transit Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Transit Management Center' manages transit vehicle fleets and coordinates with other modes and transportation services. It provides operations, maintenance, customer information, planning and management functions for the transit property. It spans distinct central dispatch and garage management systems and supports the spectrum of fixed route, flexible route, paratransit services, transit rail, and bus rapid transit (BRT) service. The physical object's interfaces support communication between transit departments and with other operating entities such as emergency response services and traffic management systems.
Parking Management Center (Destination Physical Object): The 'Parking Management Center' manages one or more parking lots by providing configuration and control of field infrastructure, user account management and interfaces with financial systems to manage payment. This p-object takes the back office portion of the Parking Management System's functionality as it was defined in ARC-IT 8.3 and prior.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- EU: SIRI - Secure Internet (ITS) (6)
- US: GTFS real-time - Secure Internet (ITS) (10)
- US: TCIP - Secure Internet (ITS) (18)
- (None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (43)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - Apache Kafka (44)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OMG DDS (44)
- (None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (50)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS MQTT (50)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS AMQP (61)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
Development needed |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
|
Facilities
Development needed |
Security
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | Regional |
Acknowledgement | True |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Destination |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | Low | Moderate | Moderate | |
Basis | Eventually intended for public consumption, so no need to obfuscate. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to function without it. Thus MODERATE generally. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to cfunction without it. Thus MODERATE generally. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |