US: ATIS - Secure Wireless Internet (ITS)

Description:

This solution is used within the U.S.. It combines standards associated with US: ATIS with those for I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (ITS). The US: ATIS standards include upper-layer standards required to implement traveler information communications. The I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (ITS) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between two entities, either or both of which may be mobile devices, but they must be stationary or only moving within wireless range of a single wireless access point (e.g., a parked car). Security is based on X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 certificates. A non-mobile (if any) endpoint may connect to the service provider using any Internet connection method.

Relevant Regions:

Comm Profile: I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (ITS)

Comm Class: WAN - Wide Area Network

Standards in Profile:

Data Profile: US: ATIS

Standards in Profile:

Solution Issues Severity: 18

The severity issue score calculation only includes issues associated with standards that are included by default.

Solution Issues:

Default Severity Name Type Description
True Low Data not defined in standard format ITS Info Gap The definition of data concepts should conform to ISO 14817-1 to promote reuse among ITS.
True Medium Exception handling not defined Facility Layer Gap The dialogs do not define how to handle exceptions (e.g., error codes, permission denied, etc).
True Medium Performance not fully defined (medium) ITS Info Gap The performance rules are not fully defined for this information flow.
True Medium Secure data access not provided Security Gap The solution does not define rules on how the application entity authenticates requests to accept or provide data.
True High Encoding rules not defined Facility Layer Gap The standards do not unambiguously define which set of encoding rules to use.
False Medium Option not standardized Standardization Gap The option set includes at least one option that is not (yet) defined in a standard.
False Medium Overlap of standards Overlap Multiple standards have been developed to address this information and it is unclear which standard should be used to address this specific information flow.
False Medium Regulatory Permission Needed Standardization Gap Deployment of this standard requires regulatory approval, which is currently subject to significant delays.
False Medium Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanism Security Gap The mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven.
False High Regulatory Issue Standardization Gap Deployment of this standard is subject to regulatory approval, which is not currently expected to be granted for deployments in the near-term.

Solution to Triples

This solution is used on the following information flow triples: