Transit Management Center --> Emissions Management Center:
transit and fare schedules
Definitions
transit and fare schedules (Information Flow): Transit service information including routes, schedules, and fare information. This also includes on-demand service information.
Transit Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Transit Management Center' manages transit vehicle fleets and coordinates with other modes and transportation services. It provides operations, maintenance, customer information, planning and management functions for the transit property. It spans distinct central dispatch and garage management systems and supports the spectrum of fixed route, flexible route, paratransit services, transit rail, and bus rapid transit (BRT) service. The physical object's interfaces support communication between transit departments and with other operating entities such as emergency response services and traffic management systems.
Emissions Management Center (Destination Physical Object): The 'Emissions Management Center' provides the capabilities for air quality managers to monitor and manage air quality. These capabilities include collecting emissions data from distributed emissions sensors (included in ITS Roadway Equipment) and directly from connected vehicles. The sensors monitor general air quality and also monitor the emissions of individual vehicles on the roadway. The measures are collected, processed, and used to support environmental monitoring applications.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
- Emissions Zone Management
- Transit Center Fixed-Route Operations
- Transit Center Information Services
- Transit Center Multi-Modal Coordination
- Transit Center Paratransit Operations
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
- transit_fare_data_for_emissions
- transit_services_for_emissions
- transit_services_performance_for_emissions
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- EU: NeTEx - Secure Internet (ITS) (3)
- US: TOMP - Secure Internet (ITS) (3)
- US: GTFS static - Secure Internet (ITS) (10)
- US: TCIP - Secure Internet (ITS) (15)
- (None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (32)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - Apache Kafka (36)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OMG DDS (36)
- (None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (42)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS MQTT (42)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS AMQP (45)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
CEN 16614-2 CEN 16614-3 CEN 12896-1 CEN 12896-2 CEN 12896-3 CEN 12896-5 CEN 12896-6 |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
|
Facilities
CEN 16614-1 |
Security
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | Regional |
Acknowledgement | True |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Destination |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | Low | Moderate | Moderate | |
Basis | Does not contain any personal or confidential information. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, the greatest impact if manipulated or incorrect data would be financial and likely limited in scope. For example, making all options appear less expensive than an attacker's route of fiduciary interest, driving revenue to his route. This is undesireable and significant, but not catastrophic. Thus MODERATE generally. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to function without frequent updates. Thus MODERATE generally, though it could be LOW depending on the level of projected updates. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |