Transit Management Center --> Payment Administration Center:
service registry
Definitions
service registry (Information Flow): Catalogue of products and values, access rights and related information.
Transit Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Transit Management Center' manages transit vehicle fleets and coordinates with other modes and transportation services. It provides operations, maintenance, customer information, planning and management functions for the transit property. It spans distinct central dispatch and garage management systems and supports the spectrum of fixed route, flexible route, paratransit services, transit rail, and bus rapid transit (BRT) service. The physical object's interfaces support communication between transit departments and with other operating entities such as emergency response services and traffic management systems.
Payment Administration Center (Destination Physical Object): The 'Payment Administration Center' provides general payment administration capabilities and supports the electronic transfer of funds from the customer to the transportation system operator or other service provider. Charges can be recorded for tolls, vehicle-mileage charging, congestion charging, or other goods and services. It supports traveler enrollment and collection of both pre-payment and post-payment transportation fees in coordination with the financial infrastructure supporting electronic payment transactions. The system may establish and administer escrow accounts depending on the clearinghouse scheme and the type of payments involved. It may post a transaction to the customer account, generate a bill (for post-payment accounts), debit an escrow account, or interface to a financial infrastructure to debit a customer designated account. It supports communications with the ITS Roadway Payment Equipment to support fee collection operations. As an alternative, a wide-area wireless interface can be used to communicate directly with vehicle equipment. It also sets and administers the pricing structures and may implement road pricing policies in coordination with the Traffic Management Center.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- US: GTFS static - Secure Internet (ITS) (8)
- (None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (32)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - Apache Kafka (36)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OMG DDS (36)
- (None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (42)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS MQTT (42)
- (None-Data) - OASIS AMQP (45)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS AMQP (45)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
GTFS |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
|
Facilities
IETF RFC 7159 ISO 21320-1 IETF RFC 4180 IETF RFC 9110 IETF RFC 9112 |
Security
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | National |
Acknowledgement | False |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Source |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | Low | Moderate | Moderate | |
Basis | Much of this information will eventually be widely disseminated to transport users, though there seems little good reason to not obfuscate it. | Could inconvience travelers if incorrect, and would hamper the operation of payment methods if incorrect or unavailable, which could have widespread network effect. | Could inconvience travelers if incorrect, and would hamper the operation of payment methods if incorrect or unavailable, which could have widespread network effect. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | False |