Border Inspection System --> Other Border Inspection Systems:
refusal of entry information
This triple is bi-directional. See also
Other Border Inspection Systems --> Border Inspection System: refusal of entry information
Definitions
refusal of entry information (Information Flow): Information on loads, vehicles, or drivers who have been refused entry to the country.
Border Inspection System (Source Physical Object): 'Border Inspection System' represents data systems used at the border for the inspection of people or goods. It supports immigration, customs (trade), agricultural, and FDA inspections as applicable. It includes sensors and surveillance systems to identify and classify drivers and their cargo as they approach a border crossing, the systems used to interface with the back-office administration systems and provide information on status of the crossing or events.
Other Border Inspection Systems (Destination Physical Object): Representing another set of Border Inspection Systems, 'Other Border Inspection Systems' is intended to provide a source and destination for information exchange between international border inspection functions. It enables traffic management activities to be coordinated across international borders..
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- (None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (43)
- (None-Data) - Apache Kafka (44)
- (None-Data) - OMG DDS (44)
- (None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (50)
- (None-Data) - OASIS AMQP (61)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
Development needed |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
Apache Zookeeper |
Facilities
Development needed Apache Kafka Apache Zookeeper |
Security
IETF RFC 8446 |
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | Adjacent |
Acknowledgement | True |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Destination |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Local | In cases where an interface is normally encapsulated by a single stakeholder, interoperability is still desirable, but the motive is vendor independence and the efficiencies and choices that an open standards-based interface provides. |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | Moderate | High | Moderate | |
Basis | Contains company information including load delivery specifics. While possibly not competitive, could be considered 'need-to-know', as anyone not providing transport services could have minimal legitimate use for this information. Possible abuses could leverage arrival and delivery information or transport operator locations. | Corruption, unavailability or unauthorized manipulation of this data could an error in border administration. | Corruption, unavailability or unauthorized manipulation of this data could an error in border administration. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |