Fleet and Freight Management Center --> Freight Distribution and Logistics Center:
booking status
Definitions
booking status (Information Flow): Status of the freight transport booking that includes the identities of the Commercial Vehicle and driver who will pick-up the freight or a request for more information from the originator. This includes proposed transport booking changes including departure/arrival changes, conveyance changes.
Fleet and Freight Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Fleet and Freight Management Center' provides the capability for commercial drivers and fleet-freight managers to receive real-time routing information and access databases containing vehicle and/or freight equipment locations as well as carrier, vehicle, freight equipment and driver information. The 'Fleet and Freight Management Center' also provides the capability for fleet managers to monitor the safety and security of their commercial vehicle drivers and fleet.
Freight Distribution and Logistics Center (Destination Physical Object): The 'Freight Distribution and Logistics Center' provides intermodal logistics support and support for the efficient distribution of freight across transport systems and modes. This can include consolidation arrangements, warehousing, and consignor-to-consignee intermodal shipping arrangements. These capabilities may be provided as part of intermodal fleet management activities or can be provided by an independent logistics specialist.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
| None |
Communication Solutions
-
(None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (43)
-
(None-Data) - Apache Kafka (44)
-
(None-Data) - OMG DDS (44)
-
(None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (50)
-
(None-Data) - OASIS AMQP (61)
Selected Solution
(None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS)Solution Description
|
ITS Application Entity
  
Development needed  |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
|
Mgmt
|
Facilities
Development needed |
Security
|
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
|
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
|||
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Time Context | Recent |
| Spatial Context | Regional |
| Acknowledgement | True |
| Cardinality | Unicast |
| Initiator | Source |
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | True |
| Interoperability | Description |
|---|---|
| Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
| Information Flow Security | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
| Rating | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
| Basis | Business and personal information included, which if disclosed would compromise the carrier whose information was affected, providing leverage over them to the 3rd party that acquired the information. | If this information is incorrect or corrupted freight trips may be delayed, which will cost time and money. | If this information is unavailable freight trips may be delayed, which will cost time and money. | |
| Security Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | True |