Border Inspection Administration Center --> Border Inspection System:
traveler personal information
Definitions
traveler personal information (Information Flow): This flow includes biometric and other data to allow recognition of travelers.
Border Inspection Administration Center (Source Physical Object): 'Border Inspection Administration Center' represents back-office systems and databases run by domestic and foreign governmental agencies responsible for the regulation of trade, and the enforcement of customs and immigration laws. These agencies include U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its counterparts in Canada and Mexico. DHS includes components like Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Other agencies include secondary trade agencies (e.g., U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, other USDOT departments, etc.), and agencies from other trading nations. The systems they manage coordinate activities related to the border crossings. These systems support import/export cargo processing and enforcement operations at the border, including programs such as FAST, Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), Nexus (Canada), SENTRI (Mexico), and US-VISIT.
Border Inspection System (Destination Physical Object): 'Border Inspection System' represents data systems used at the border for the inspection of people or goods. It supports immigration, customs (trade), agricultural, and FDA inspections as applicable. It includes sensors and surveillance systems to identify and classify drivers and their cargo as they approach a border crossing, the systems used to interface with the back-office administration systems and provide information on status of the crossing or events.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
| None |
Communication Solutions
-
(None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (43)
Selected Solution
(None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS)Solution Description
|
ITS Application Entity
  
Development needed  |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
|
Mgmt
|
Facilities
Development needed |
Security
|
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
|
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
|||
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Time Context | Recent |
| Spatial Context | Local |
| Acknowledgement | True |
| Cardinality | Unicast |
| Initiator | Destination |
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | True |
| Interoperability | Description |
|---|---|
| Local | In cases where an interface is normally encapsulated by a single stakeholder, interoperability is still desirable, but the motive is vendor independence and the efficiencies and choices that an open standards-based interface provides. |
Security
| Information Flow Security | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
| Rating | Moderate | High | Moderate | |
| Basis | This flow includes PII of travelers. If it also includes the necessary challenge questions and response to impersonate that individual, it could be classified as a HIGH. | False data here could allow someone to impersonate someone else. This may lead to an unauthorized person entering the country. | The system must have an acknowledgement of a missed message. If this data is not received, the traveler will have to identify themselves through the traditional methods, such as a passport. | |
| Security Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | True |