EU: Signal Control Messages - Secure Wireless Internet (EU)

Description:

This solution is used within Australia and the E.U.. It combines standards associated with EU: Signal Control Messages with those for I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (EU). The EU: Signal Control Messages standards include upper-layer standards required to implement signal control information flows. The I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (EU) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between two entities, either or both of which may be mobile devices, but they must be stationary or only moving within wireless range of a single wireless access point (e.g., a parked car). Security is based on X.509 certificates. A non-mobile (if any) endpoint may connect to the service provider using any Internet connection method.

Relevant Regions:

• Australia
• European Union

Comm Profile: I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (EU)

Comm Class: WAN - Wide Area Network

Level	Standard
Access	Wireless Internet Alternatives (EU)
Mgmt	Bundle: SNMPv3 MIB
Security	Secure Session Alternatives
TransNet	Internet Transport Alternatives
TransNet	IP Alternatives

Data Profile: EU: Signal Control Messages

Level	Standard
Facilities	ETSI 103 301 Vehicle Comms -Facilities layer Protocols & Comms for Infra Svcs
ITS Application Entity	ETSI 102 894-2 U&AR Common Data Dict
ITS Application Entity	ISO 19091 V2I for signalized intersections
ITS Application Entity	SAE J2735 DSRC Message Set

Solution Issues Severity: 16

Solution Issues:

Default	Severity	Name	Type	Description
True	Low	Data not defined in standard format	ITS Info Gap	The definition of data concepts should conform to ISO 14817-1 to promote reuse among ITS.
True	Low	Not a standard (minor)	Standardization Gap	The document is publicly available and widely used but it is not currently a formal standard.
True	Medium	Outdated security reference	Security Gap	The standard solution includes an outdated security reference.
True	Medium	Secure data access not provided	Security Gap	The solution does not define rules on how the application entity authenticates requests to accept or provide data.
True	High	Data/comm profile pairing	Standardization Gap	There are ambiguities as to how to (or if one should) couple the upper-layer standards defined in this solution with the indicated lower-layer standards.
False	Medium	Option not standardized	Standardization Gap	The option set includes at least one option that is not (yet) defined in a standard.
False	Medium	Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanism	Security Gap	The mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven.

Solution to Triples

Source	Flow	Destination
Map Update System	intersection geometry	Personal
Map Update System	intersection geometry	Vehicle